CogniqOS
Subscribe

TRAP #138 ·VOL I The Individual · Attention, Prediction & Knowledge Gaps

The Hungry Judge Effect

Discovered by Shai Danziger, 2011

Your moral reasoning is partly a function of your blood sugar.
Category: BiasEvidence: ContestedUniversality: ModerateTier 2Type: Patternⓘ what these mean

This is a Lexicon entry: the mechanism, when it shows up, and the countermeasure. The full correction, with real-world cases and the audit prompt, hasn't been written yet.

Definition

The tendency for sensory states inside the body - hunger, fatigue, pain - to influence judgments about entirely unrelated external matters. Judges grant parole more often after eating.

When it shows up

Judgments made by tired, hungry or uncomfortable evaluators: parole boards, job interviewers, graders. Any setting where physiological state affects unrelated decisions.

Failure mode

Internal bodily states leak into judgments about external matters. Judges grant parole more often after meals; graders mark more harshly when hungry. The state contamination is invisible to the judge experiencing it.

Countermeasure

If you're making consequential judgments, check your physiological state first: eaten, rested, not in pain. If not, defer the judgment. Knowing about the effect doesn't prevent it; managing the state does.

Related traps

Also connected in the mapThe Affect Heuristic·3 more, locked

Credit & first seen

DiscoveredPopularized by Danziger, Levav and Avnaim-Pesso (2011); the broader phenomenon studied as 'interoceptive bias' in cognitive neuroscience. source ↗

Read next

Want the full correction for The Hungry Judge Effect?

This entry has the mechanism and countermeasure. The full write-up - real cases, sources, the audit prompt - comes later.

Entry #138 of 631 in The Lexicon · see the full Lexicon