CogniqOS
Subscribe

TRAP #044 ·VOL I The Individual · Judgment & Evaluation Errors

Proportionality Bias

Discovered by Patrick Leman, 2007

We assume that big events must have big causes and small events must have small causes.
Category: BiasEvidence: ContestedTier 2Type: Patternⓘ what these mean

This is a Lexicon entry: the mechanism, when it shows up, and the countermeasure. The full correction, with real-world cases and the audit prompt, hasn't been written yet.

When it shows up

Conspiracy theories thrive on this: a president's assassination must involve a grand conspiracy, not a lone shooter. A financial crash must have a mastermind, not a cascade of small failures. Conversely, we underestimate the power of small, compounding causes to produce large effects.

Failure mode

Dismissing simple explanations for complex events. Overcomplicating root cause analysis. Missing the small, unglamorous factors that actually drive outcomes. Searching for proportional villains instead of systemic causes.

Countermeasure

Ask: "Could a small, boring cause produce this large, dramatic effect?" Review cases where disproportionate cause-effect relationships are documented: butterfly effects, cascading failures, compound interest.

Related traps

Also connected in the mapThe Narrative Fallacy·2 more, locked

Read next

Want the full correction for Proportionality Bias?

This entry has the mechanism and countermeasure. The full write-up - real cases, sources, the audit prompt - comes later.

Entry #44 of 631 in The Lexicon · see the full Lexicon