CogniqOS
Subscribe

TRAP #068 ·VOL I The Individual · Decision-Making & Choice

Non-Adaptive Choice Switching (Hot Stove Effect)

Discovered by Jerker Denrell, 2001

After a bad outcome, we avoid the option that produced it - even when the outcome was random and the option remains optimal.
Category: BiasEvidence: ReplicatedTier 2Type: Patternⓘ what these mean

This is a Lexicon entry: the mechanism, when it shows up, and the countermeasure. The full correction, with real-world cases and the audit prompt, hasn't been written yet.

When it shows up

Mark Twain's cat who sat on a hot stove: she never sat on a hot stove again but she never sat on a cold one either. Investors who abandon an asset class after one bad year. Managers who stop delegating after one employee underperforms. Diners who never return to a restaurant after one bad meal.

Failure mode

Learning the wrong lesson from negative experience. Over-generalising from a single bad outcome. Systematically avoiding options that are statistically superior because of one salient failure. The emotional memory of the bad outcome dominates the statistical reality.

Countermeasure

Ask: "Was the bad outcome caused by the option itself or by randomness?" Distinguish between options that are genuinely worse and options where you got unlucky. Apply CL-2 (Base Rate Check).

Related traps

Also connected in the mapOutcome Bias·3 more, locked

Read next

Want the full correction for Non-Adaptive Choice Switching (Hot Stove Effect)?

This entry has the mechanism and countermeasure. The full write-up - real cases, sources, the audit prompt - comes later.

Entry #68 of 631 in The Lexicon · see the full Lexicon