CogniqOS
Subscribe

TRAP #102 ·VOL I The Individual · Self-Deception & Motivated Reasoning

Moral Luck

Discovered by Thomas Nagel, 1976

Identical actions get judged differently based on outcomes we don't control.
Category: BiasEvidence: ReplicatedUniversality: HighTier 1Type: Mechanismⓘ what these mean

This is a Lexicon entry: the mechanism, when it shows up, and the countermeasure. The full correction, with real-world cases and the audit prompt, hasn't been written yet.

Definition

The phenomenon in which we assign greater or lesser moral praise or blame to people based on outcomes that were partly or entirely outside their control.

When it shows up

Judgments of blame and praise after outcomes: the drunk driver who didn't hit anyone versus the one who did, identical recklessness rated differently based on chance.

Failure mode

Identical actions are judged differently based on outcomes that depended on luck. Blame and praise track results, not behaviour, even though behaviour is the only thing the actor controlled.

Countermeasure

Judge the action by the reasoning behind it and the foreseeable risk, not by how it turned out. Two drunk drivers are equally culpable; the one who hit a child was unluckier, not worse.

Related traps

Also connected in the mapThe Fundamental Attribution Error·Outcome Bias·3 more, locked

Credit & first seen

DiscoveredNagel, T.&Williams, B. (1976).'Moral luck.'Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume) 50, 115-135. Introduced simultaneously and independently by both philosophers in paired papers published in the same volume. source ↗

Read next

Want the full correction for Moral Luck?

This entry has the mechanism and countermeasure. The full write-up - real cases, sources, the audit prompt - comes later.

Entry #102 of 631 in The Lexicon · see the full Lexicon