CogniqOS
Subscribe

TRAP #062 ·VOL I The Individual · Decision-Making & Choice

Duration Neglect

Discovered by Donald Redelmeier, 1996

A good ending rewrites a bad experience. A bad ending ruins a good one. The middle counts for almost nothing.
Category: BiasEvidence: ReplicatedUniversality: HighTier 1Type: Mechanismⓘ what these mean

This is a Lexicon entry: the mechanism, when it shows up, and the countermeasure. The full correction, with real-world cases and the audit prompt, hasn't been written yet.

Definition

The finding that the length of an experience has almost no effect on how we remember or evaluate it - only the peak intensity and the final moments matter.

When it shows up

Retrospective evaluation of experiences: vacations, medical procedures, workouts, relationships. Any judgment about 'how good/bad was that?' made after the experience is over.

Failure mode

Total duration is ignored. The remembered quality is determined almost entirely by the peak intensity and the final moment. A short intense bad experience is remembered as worse than a long mild bad one.

Countermeasure

Separate 'how was it?' into peak, end and duration. When designing experiences for others (or planning your own), invest disproportionately in the ending; it will dominate memory.

Related traps

Also connected in the map6 more, locked

Credit & first seen

DiscoveredRedelmeier, D.A.&Kahneman, D. (1996).'Patients'memories of painful medical treatments.' Pain 66(1), 3-8 source ↗

Also revealed

Want the full correction for Duration Neglect?

This entry has the mechanism and countermeasure. The full write-up - real cases, sources, the audit prompt - comes later.

Entry #62 of 631 in The Lexicon · see the full Lexicon