This is a Lexicon entry: the mechanism, when it shows up, and the countermeasure. The full correction, with real-world cases and the audit prompt, hasn't been written yet.
Definition
The mental discomfort experienced when holding two conflicting beliefs, making it difficult to change one's mind. Note: It remains unclear whether dissonance reduction involves a distinct aversive motivational state (as the original theory proposes) or simply self-perception processes (as Bem's alternative account suggests). The two theories make identical predictions in most circumstances. When it shows up: After making a costly decision, performing an action inconsistent with stated values or receiving evidence that contradicts a held belief. High-stakes instance: Post-purchase rationalisation - documented in consumer research, medical treatment adherence and political belief updating: commitment to a position produces belief change that brings the belief into line with the action, rather than the reverse. Failure mode: The discomfort of holding incompatible beliefs/actions is resolved by changing whichever is easier to change, which is rarely the action and often the belief. The person ends up sincerely holding the view that justifies what they did, having forgotten they started with different views. Estimated cost: Moderate - partially reversible where this bias dominates unchecked decisions.
Countermeasure
Notice when belief updates coincide suspiciously with actions. Ask: 'Did the evidence change or did my behaviour create the need for the new view?' Dissonance reduction masquerades as reasoning.
Related traps
Also connected in the map11 more, locked
Credit & first seen
DiscoveredIntroduced by social psychologist Leon Festinger in A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957). source ↗
Also revealed
Entry #91 of 631 in The Lexicon · see the full Lexicon