This is a Lexicon entry: the mechanism, when it shows up, and the countermeasure. The full correction, with real-world cases and the audit prompt, hasn't been written yet.
When it shows up
Evaluating arguments in debates, policy analysis, assessing business proposals. A well-structured argument for an unpopular conclusion gets rejected; a poorly structured argument for a popular conclusion gets accepted. In hiring: candidates whose worldview matches the interviewer's get credited with stronger reasoning.
Failure mode
Accepting invalid arguments because the conclusion feels right. Rejecting valid arguments because the conclusion feels wrong. Logical structure becomes invisible when emotional agreement is present.
Countermeasure
Evaluate the argument's structure independently of its conclusion. Ask: "Would I accept this reasoning if it led to a conclusion I disagreed with?" Apply CL-4 (Disconfirming Evidence Search).
Related traps
Also connected in the map3 more, locked
Also revealed
Entry #7 of 631 in The Lexicon · see the full Lexicon