CogniqOS
Subscribe

TRAP #054 ·VOL I The Individual · Decision-Making & Choice

Additive Bias

Given the choice to fix or add, we almost always add.
Category: BiasEvidence: ContestedUniversality: ModerateTier 2Type: Patternⓘ what these mean

This is a Lexicon entry: the mechanism, when it shows up, and the countermeasure. The full correction, with real-world cases and the audit prompt, hasn't been written yet.

Definition

The tendency to solve problems by adding elements rather than removing them, even when subtraction would be more effective. When asked to improve something, people overwhelmingly think "what can I add?" rather than "what can I take away?"

When it shows up

When improving a product, plan or space; when solving problems under time pressure; when asked "what would make this better?".

Failure mode

Adding features, steps or complexity when removal would be faster and cheaper. Documents that grow longer instead of clearer. Meetings that gain agenda items but never lose them.

Countermeasure

Explicitly ask the subtraction question first: "What could I remove?" before asking "What could I add?" Set a rule: justify every addition.

Related traps

Also connected in the map2 more, locked

Credit & first seen

DiscoveredAdams, J. et al. (2021).People systematically overlook subtractive changes.Nature 592, 258-261 source ↗

Also revealed

Want the full correction for Additive Bias?

This entry has the mechanism and countermeasure. The full write-up - real cases, sources, the audit prompt - comes later.

Entry #54 of 631 in The Lexicon · see the full Lexicon